My Thoughts on This And After Life

When I was reading a blog online, I came across an interesting question. If you are on a torpedoing airplane, what would you do? The irresolutely evangelical Christian blogger's answer was that everyone would pray to Jesus. She just could not see how anyone, again anyone, would do otherwise. I was not surprised at her answer and her inability to see how anyone would think differently.

What would I do? I would probably take stock of how my life has been. Whether I am leaving this world with regrets or without. I am striving toward no regrets everyday, and that is how I choose to live. I would also probably make a mental list of all those that I love and make sure that I say for one last time "I love you" before I depart.

I attended a Catholic funeral a few weeks ago. It was a real ritual: the songs, the ceremony, the whole thing. A woman from the choir sang, "Jesus is my shepherd, and there is nothing more that I want." Here we were, gathered to pay respect to a young man whose life was tragically cut short. And that is what this woman is singing. He is returning to God as will we all return to God. That is what ultimately what everyone wants, including him and all of us. He is going to a better place, so we shan't be sorry or sad for him. But what if you were? The whole ceremony, it seemed to me, was designed, not to celebrate the life that this young man had led, but rather assuage our fears of mortality because the afterlife is better than this life.

This is when I, between the sobbing and the crying, began to think about the role of religion in this life. And then it occurred to me that all religions is really about the afterlife. Because we know nothing about it, whether it really exists or not, we are divided in our thoughts. On the one hand, we would like to continue this life in the afterlife (in which case we try to take as much of this life as we can as the mummies did). On the other hand, we think that there is a better life afterward (as Christians, Muslims do), and we do what we can to earn it. Or you reap what you sow, and you are reincarnated accordingly (Buddhists).

I have a more empirical attitude toward it. I cannot possibly know anything about it, so I am going to live life so that whenever I am departing, I do so without regrets. I do not mean it in a hedonistic way. I do believe that humans, no matter what religion or no religion, have a moral compass. Therefore, we strive toward having our positive mark by striving toward being good because being good is a goal in and of itself. Not because it holds the promise of heaven in the afterlife, but rather because it is good.

Christians fail to see that. They use God and Jesus as crutches, as that external force that tells them to be good or to do this or that. How about we turn that inward? Can we be innately good? Don't we believe in the goodness of the heart? I think that is a better to improve oneself because the motivation is truly from within rather than without.

Bobby Jindal, the folksy hero?

Everyone agrees. Bobby Jindal had a tough act to follow. He had to rebut a popular American president, one of the most gifted orators since perhaps Lincoln himself. The president had just given an impassioned speech, had the Congress swooning and, gasp, its members hugging him. Now, since when do men hug each other like that?

And here comes Jindal. He is not a presence, nor does he have the gift of oratory, that much we knew. We knew, however, that he was a smart man, perhaps of intellect to equal the president's. Jindal's voice is not thunderous, his speech lacks the cadence that the president so skillfully employs, we knew that too. To expect him to match the president would have been impossible. But we expected Jindal to at least give us something different than what so many of us were used to as coming from the GOP. After all, he is supposed to be the standard bearer of the new GOP. And what happened? He came across as "amateurish," uncomfortable, and not genuine. Hmmmm, how did that happen?

I am a Korean-American woman who lives in the South. I live on the coast of North Carolina, and I stick out. There is simply no getting around it. I go to PTA meetings. I am the only Asian. I go to school board meetings. I am the only Asian. In fact, I make frequent appearance on the news, not as a reporter, but as someone that the camera zooms on. Call me a token. That is just the way it is where I live.

I have lived in North Carolina now going on 10 years. I have picked up a little bit of the Southern drawl, and I can sometimes imitate it pretty well. My musical training has helped me with that. However, I may talk like that all I want, but I make no mistake about the fact that, in the locals' eyes, I am never one of them. I know that. I simply don't look the part. So I don't try to be. I find that I get more respect for knowing what I am talking about rather than sounding like one of them.

So, here is what Bobby Jindal did wrong. He tried too hard to sound like everyone. He tried to be the folksy hero that the Republicans have tried to serve up every election. Therein lies the first of his two mistakes. He forgot that folksy did not work during this election. Sarah Palin had the folksiness all locked up, and she didn't help the party any. In fact, she made folksiness popular at the cost of being intelligent. So instead of being folksy, he should have been himself, arguing and making valid points.

Much more than that, however, is the second mistake that he made. In trying to be folksy, Bobby Jindal forgot who he was. The reason that he has been hailed as the savior of the Republican party is because he is so unlike the Republicans of the recent past. He is the child of immigrants, he is young, he is not Wonder Bread white, and he is patently intelligent. But he tried so hard to be one of them, to be folksy. I know, and I bet he knows that he will never, ever be folksy in so many folksy people's eyes. He simply does not look the part just like I will never be a Southerner.

Perhaps Jindal's cluelessness is just indicative of the implosion within the GOP itself. As David Brooks argues, it doesn't know where it wants to go, what it wants to be. While personifying the kind of transformation that the GOP needs by simply being what he is, Bobby Jindal does not know how to convince the GOP any other way than the good old folksy way. The new GOP and the old GOP are mutually exclusive. And that is the logical conclusion that he should have drawn before he appeared before the camera.

So, here is to more implosions with the GOP. The drama continues.